HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Thursday, September 11, 2008

Picnic Basket? Check. Bug Spray? Check. Ammo? Check.

Energy and natural resources are issues critically important to America's future. Sound energy and resource policy can make our environment cleaner, spur economic growth, and improve national security.

With that in mind, it's perplexing that today the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee wasted time and taxpayer money debated and approved a bill to allow loaded guns in national parks.

The bill would end the 25-year-old ban on carrying loaded guns in national parks. (If state law banned gun possession in parks, the state policy would supersede the new law and remain in effect.) The bill passed the committee in an 18-5, according to CQPolitics.com.

The bill would accomplish the same goal as a Bush administration rule Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne proposed in April. Reg•Watch thinks the Interior rule will be among the many rules the Bush administration pushes through in its final months in order to secure its ideological legacy.

Both the bill and the proposed rule are remarkably unnecessary. An April Associated Press article explains:

There is no data to suggest that the public would be served by allowing visitors to parks to possess concealed handguns, [Coalition of National Park Service Retirees Chairman Bill] Wade and other critics said. They cited statistics showing that national parks are among the safest places in the country. The probability of becoming a victim of a violent crime in a national park is 1 in more than 708,000 — less likely than being struck by lightning, the groups said.

On the other hand, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC), unmoved by fact, said, "The purpose of this bill is to protect innocent Americans from violent crime in national parks," according to CQPolitics.com.

However, since Congress almost never actually passes legislation, the Interior regulation is still the best bet for gun rights advocates hoping to arm national parks. Stay tuned to Reg•Watch for updates.



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Bush Administration Politicos Will Stick Around

Rules of the Road: DOT Puts Truck Drivers and Motorists at Risk

Last-Minute Rule Allows More Dirty Oil Production

Recommendations on Regulatory Reform for the Next President and Congress

Bush Handing over Wilderness to Oil and Gas Industry

New Rule Likely to Cut Health Care for the Poor

For High Court, High Stakes Case on Preemption

Watching out for Midnight Regulations

FDA Experts Fought Rule to Protect Drug Makers

Science Advisors Chide FDA on Plastics Chemical

Archived Entries for In Congress

November

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004