HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Monday, September 08, 2008

Mine Agency Proposes Mandatory Drug Testing

The Bush administration has proposed yet another rule that may be in violation of the controversial Bolten memo. On May 9, White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten instructed federal agencies to propose by June 1 any rule they wished to finalize by the end of the Bush administration. However, a number of agencies are rushing through controversial rules that defy Bolten's deadline, and the White House seems to have no objections.

This time the culprit is the Mine Safety and Health Administration. MSHA is proposing to require mine operators to test employees in "safety-sensitive" positions for drug and alcohol use. Here are some of the provisions from the proposed rule, which MSHA published today in the Federal Register:

  • "Any applicant for a safety-sensitive position must be tested for the presence of drugs before performing safety-sensitive job duties."
  • "Any applicant for a safety-sensitive position must receive an alcohol test after a conditional offer of employment has been made and before performing safety-sensitive job duties."
  • "Mine operators must randomly conduct unannounced alcohol and drug tests of their miners."
  • " A mine operator shall conduct an alcohol and/or drug test when the mine operator has reasonable suspicion to believe that the miner has misused a prohibited substance."

(MSHA defines safety-sensitive job duties as, "Any type of work activity where a momentary lapse of critical concentration could result in an accident, injury, or death.")

The Bush administration is working on this rule with surprising swiftness, considering its poor record on mine safety and occupational safety in general. And MSHA will only be taking public comment on the rule for 30 days. (The typical public comment period lasts at least 60 days.)

MSHA has been considering the rule since at least 2005, but the evidence indicates it may be making a final push to get the rule out the door before the end of the Bush administration.

Such a push may be welcomed by industry (or is industry behind the push?). Ken Ward of the Charleston Gazette reports, "Coal industry officials have long sought an MSHA rule to require drug testing of miners." For another perspective, Ward adds, "[B]ut the United Mine Workers union has questioned the need for such testing and worried about the specifics of how companies would carry out such testing."



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Bush Administration Politicos Will Stick Around

Rules of the Road: DOT Puts Truck Drivers and Motorists at Risk

Last-Minute Rule Allows More Dirty Oil Production

Recommendations on Regulatory Reform for the Next President and Congress

Bush Handing over Wilderness to Oil and Gas Industry

New Rule Likely to Cut Health Care for the Poor

For High Court, High Stakes Case on Preemption

Watching out for Midnight Regulations

FDA Experts Fought Rule to Protect Drug Makers

Science Advisors Chide FDA on Plastics Chemical

Archived Entries for Industry Influence

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004