Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Tuesday, July 08, 2008

OMB Releases FY 2008 Earmarks Data

OMB has released additional data on federal earmarks contained in the FY 2008 appropriations bills yesterday. The data is available at www.earmarks.gov. I have to continue to applaud OMB for publishing information online about federal spending in this earmark database. They have continued to improve the interface of the earmarks database and list earmark by agency, by state, and they now provide a summary of earmarks totaled up by appropriations subcommittee - a great addition. You can also do a keyword search across all the data they post.

One feature I'd love to see added is a summary or way to total earmarks data by sponsor. In order to see who requested or sponsored an earmark, you currently have to drill down a long way in the database - sometimes four or five levels. Adding up the total amounts of earmarks secured by legislator - or by the president - would go a long way to improving accountability for federal spending.

While OMB has done a good job making this kind of data accessible and understandable, we could know a lot more if better data was required to be made public. More importantly, it would be significantly easier to hold our elected leaders accountable if the information was available before debate and voting on appropriations bills took place in Congress. That's what would be required if a provision originally sponsored by Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) would be adopted by Congress. DeMint's provision was originally included in a reform package passed by the Senate in early 2007, but it was later dropped in conference.

It's almost assured Congress will not adopt anything like the DeMint amendment this year, but I'm hopeful when the 111th Congress begins in January, better reforms will be adopted that allow the public to weigh in on spending proposals before Congress passes them.



Posted by Adam Hughes



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

The Best Laid Plans

Earmarks Declining? Not So Fast...

CHN Hosting Prep Webinar on Census Poverty Data Release

The $18 Trillion Mortgage

More on DCAA Dysfunction

Bush Administration Backs Off SCHIP Restrictions

The Greater of Two Evils

Effective Government

Notes from the Economy: Prices, Earnings, Unemployment Claims

Looking for Top Notch Interns!

Archived Entries for Appropriations & Spending

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004

July, 2004

June, 2004

May, 2004

April, 2004

March, 2004

February, 2004

January, 2004

December, 2003

November, 2003

September, 2003

August, 2003

July, 2003