Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Demanding a federal budget that is fair, responsible, and meets our nation's priorities

Home :  Federal Budget & Tax : 
Federal Budget & Tax:      News     Blog     Background    



Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Plus Ca Change All Over Again on Extenders

McConnell, Kyl, & Grassley Browbeat Biz-Boys

The Senate again today defeated a cloture motion (to permit voting) on the bill to extend a raft of popular tax breaks, by a vote of 52-44.

379 large U.S. companies, among them Bank of America, Boeing, Citigroup, Ford Motor Co., Pfizer and Walt Disney, wrote the Senate a letter yesterday warning that failing to approve tax extension provisions could harm the economy. Mindful that House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) and House Ways & Means chair Charles Rangel (D-NY) are adamant about paying for the extenders bill, the companies have made it clear they are determined to see the bill pass, even if it complies with PAYGO.

Word on the Hill is that some of those business leaders met this afternoon with Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-AZ) and Finance ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-IA), and got a talking to. The Senators told them support for Senate Finance Committee chair Max Baucus' (D-MT) extenders bill -- which complies with PAYGO -- would threaten their relationship with conservative lawmakers, "ma[king] it very clear to the business community that they have the votes to block cloture," according to a lobbyist present at the meeting.

The reason for the tough talk? The business community may not oppose the offsets contained in the Baucus bill, the Senators told them, but they might oppose future offsets and Republicans must be consistent in their opposition.



Posted by Dana Chasin



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Appropriations & Spending

Federal Tax Policy

Income/Wealth Inequality

Budget Projections

Government Performance

Estate Tax

State Fiscal Policy

Watcher

Entitlements

Budget Process

Debt & Deficit

Oversight & Enforcement

Transparency

Privatization

Contact Us

Most Recent Entries for Federal Budget & Tax

It's Official: Another Deficit Record Set

House Democrats to Begin Crafting Stimulus Package

CBO Projects Largest Deficit in History

The Cost of TARP, Dollars and Opportunity

House Approves, Bush Signs Bailout Bill

Timely CTJ Report Pushes for Reagan Tax Proposal

FedSpending.org Will Blow Your Mind

Senate Approves Bailout; Cost "Impossible" to Predict

Interesting Perspectives on the Bailout

Senate Attempts to Sweeten Bailout Bill

Archived Entries for Federal Tax Policy

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004

September, 2004

August, 2004

June, 2004

January, 2004

December, 2003

November, 2003

September, 2003

August, 2003

July, 2003