Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Wednesday, March 19, 2008

The VA Can Deny Third Party Voter Registration on its Property

A recent AlterNet story highlights an unfortunate case that has been going on since the 2004 presidential election, challenging the refusal of the Veterans Administration to help soldiers register to vote. In August 2007 the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, in Preminger v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs upheld a decision that permitted the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) to exclude voter registration by third-party groups in VA facilities; "we cannot say that it is unreasonable for the VA to regulate the activities taking place on its grounds and to exercise its discretion in determining when a 'demonstration' (defined to include 'partisan activities') would be disruptive." And recently in February, the case was denied rehearing.

It is pretty outrageous that the VA continues to block efforts to help U.S. soldiers register to vote at its facilities. Scott Rafferty, an attorney in the Preminger case was quoted in the AlterNet article saying, "This is politically motivated voter suppression."

Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and John Kerry (D-MA) sent a letter to VA Secretary James B. Peake urging that all veterans in VA facilities should be able to participate in voter registration activities. The senators' letter states; "Certainly we all agree it is an insult to those who have fought to spread democracy and freedom overseas to be denied the right to participate in their own democracy here at home."

Furthermore, we understand that the Court of Appeals seemed to indicate that the VA's role in assisting veterans was purely medical. However, the VA has a long and proud history of providing a myriad of services to veterans - helping them lead successful and productive lives. Providing them with the opportunity to become more actively involved in our democracy seems an appropriate role for the VA. The argument that providing access to voter registration at facilities would distract from the medical goals is as unfortunate as it is counterproductive.



Posted by Amanda Adams



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Charity Sues Government for Freezing Its Assets

Nonviolent Activists Placed on Terror Lists

New Fact Sheet for 501(c)(3) Groups On Proper Contact With Campaigns

Ex-Offender Voter Rights Confuse Alabama Officials

New 501(c)(4) Group Files A Familiar Lawsuit

New GAO Report on Lobbyist Compliance with Disclosure Reporting

U.S. Government Stops International Charity's Family Planning Work

Early Voting is Changing the Meaning of Election Day

EU Court Says Charity Listed as Terrorist Has Due Process Rights

Dozens of Pastors Violate Federal Tax Law by Endorsing Political Candidates from the Pulpit

Archived Entries for Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007