Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Tuesday, August 28, 2007

OMB Watch Submits Comments on Partner Vetting System; Administration Delays Its Operation

Possibly because of last week's publicity that opposition to the proposed U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Partner Vetting System from charitable organizations was increasing caused the Bush administration to postpone the start of the program until the agency reviews comments. The Washington Post reports that representatives of USAID's security office will meet with organizations that sent comments in response to the July 17 notice. This would be the first time that the program is actually discussed with a group of representatives who will be affected.

USAID's acting deputy administrator, James Kunder said even though the notice in the Federal Register said yesterday was the last day for organizations to comment on the proposal, comments will be accepted through the end of next month. "Kunder said in a telephone interview that it 'would be effective, but not operational' until there is 'a systematic review' of the views of the private organizations involved." However, the The Chronicle of Philanthropy ($$) reports that Harry Edwards, a spokesman for the Agency for International Development, could not confirm Kunder's comments.

Most unfortunate is the fact that groups who are rejected would not be told why. This secrecy was part of the focus covered by OMB Watch in comments submitted to USAID. The Washington Post article also cited Kunder to have said that whether the agency could confirm or deny that individuals passed the screening is still being considered. OMB Watch comments also focused on the problems with using watchlists for the vetting.



Posted by Amanda Adams



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Democracy 21 Files FEC Complaint Against Two Groups

FEC May Approve VoterVoter.com

Charity Sues Government for Freezing Its Assets

Nonviolent Activists Placed on Terror Lists

New Fact Sheet for 501(c)(3) Groups On Proper Contact With Campaigns

Ex-Offender Voter Rights Confuse Alabama Officials

New 501(c)(4) Group Files A Familiar Lawsuit

New GAO Report on Lobbyist Compliance with Disclosure Reporting

U.S. Government Stops International Charity's Family Planning Work

Early Voting is Changing the Meaning of Election Day

Archived Entries for Charities and Security

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

May, 2005