Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Home :  Regulatory Policy :  RegWatch : 
RegWatch:     

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

 R    E    G    •    W    A    T    C    H 


Thursday, August 09, 2007

Science Panel Releases Final Report on Plastics Chemical

The National Toxicology Program's Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR) has released its final report on bisphenol-A and the adverse effects in humans resulting from exposure. Bisphenol-A is a component of plastics commonly found in a wide variety of consumer products like drink containers and CDs.

As Reg•Watch blogged last week, a group of 38 scientists recently concluded bisphenol-A exposure causes adverse effects in the human reproductive system.

The CERHR report is less conclusive. The panel described the risks to human reproduction as "negligible" and "minimal", according to USA Today. The panel stressed the need for further research before more conclusive findings can be made.

The Environmental Working Group is highly critical of the final report for relying on flawed science and for not taking this opportunity to address the risk of bisphenol-A exposure, an issue environmentalists have been concerned with for many years. Read the Environmental Working Group's statement here.

The CERHR report has been the object of controversy for some time. In March, OMB Watch reported on Sciences International, a contractor with ties to the plastics industry which had been hired by CERHR to prepare the report on bisphenol-A exposure. After it was alleged Sciences International's conflict of interest had led to suspect scientific research, their contract was terminated. However, the contractor's work served as the basis for the final report.

Related Post: Plastics Make It Possible?



Posted by Matt Madia



Entries by Theme

All Themes

Enforcement

About This Blog

Rollbacks

Safety

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

In Congress

Publications

Consumer Issues

Environment

Public Health

In the Courts

Oversight

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Industry Pressuring EPA to Weaken Lead Rule

EPA Won't Keep Rocket Fuel out of Water

Roof Strength Rule Delayed Again

Bush Taking Credit for Whale Rule He Delayed

What Should the U.S. Do about China's Bad Milk?

Did OMB Block Asbestos Cleanup in Montana Town?

Whale Protection Rule Clears White House, 573 Days Later

EPA Just Kidding Around on Children's Health

White House, EPA Protecting Rocket Fuel Polluters

Pentagon Won't Clean up Its Messes

Archived Entries for Public Health

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

November, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

February, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004

October, 2004