Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

HOME

ABOUT US

OUR ISSUES

Federal Budget

Information & Access

Regulatory Policy


PRESS ROOM

ACTION CENTER

PUBLICATIONS

THE WATCHER

OUR BLOGS


SIGN UP

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

DONATE

Help support our work


OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

RTK NET

NPAction

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

OMB Watch Logo

Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy

Home :  Nonprofit Issues :  Advocacy Blog : 
Advocacy Blog:     

Advocacy Blog


Wednesday, November 23, 2005

ACLU Files Suit in "Denver Three" Case
A lawsuit filed yesterday by the ACLU was filed on behalf of Leslie Weise and Alex Young, who gained national attention after being removed from a March 21 event with President Bush. The presidential visit was open to the public and advertised as a town hall "conversation" on Social Security reform. But the ACLU lawsuit charges that Weise and Young, who had obtained tickets from the office of Representative Bob Beauprez and had caused no disruption at the town hall, were removed from the event solely because of their perceived political views.

"The government should not be in the business of silencing Americans who are perceived to be critical of certain policy decisions," said ACLU Senior Staff Attorney Chris Hansen, who is the lead counsel in this case. "The president should be willing to be in the same room with people who might disagree with him, especially at a public, taxpayer-funded town hall."

For background on the incident.

Posted by Jennifer Lowe, 12:38:30 PM



Friday, November 18, 2005

FEC Exempts Blogs From Regulation Through Press Exemption
From BNA:

In a move hailed as freeing the Internet from regulation, the Federal Election Commission ruled Nov. 17 that a company operating "unabashedly progressive" blogs is eligible for the "press exemption" from campaign finance limits.

The FEC commissioners voted unanimously in an open meeting to approve an advisory opinion (AO 2005-16) requested by Fired Up! LLC, a company founded by prominent Democrats that says its blogs will explicitly support and seek contributions for federal candidates. The FEC said Fired Up! should be considered a "press entity" because its "core" activities involved providing news and commentary.

The ruling still leaves another major issue for the FEC--whether to apply campaign finance limits to financing of paid political advertising on the Internet. The FEC has a pending proposed rule that would regulate in this area. Meanwhile, Congress is considering legislation that would prevent the FEC from defining any online messages about federal candidates as "public communications" subject to regulation.

The decision to provide bloggers with the same press exemption for FEC rules long enjoyed by members of the traditional media represented a "powerful statement," according to Michael Toner, the FEC's Republican vice chair. Toner said the action recognized that it was the goal of the Federal Election Campaign Act "to protect the media in all its forms." He noted that the law has long guaranteed the right of any media outlet to discuss political campaigns and even endorse candidates, so long as it is not controlled by a candidate or political party.

Read the draft advisory opinion

Posted by Jennifer Lowe, 01:40:45 PM



Thursday, November 03, 2005

Oral Argument in Dobbins Case Yesterday
Yesterday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in Velazquez v. Legal Services Corporation (LSC), a lawsuit brought by three New York nonprofit organizations that provide free legal representation to low-income people. Burt Neuborne of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, appearing for the legal services organizations, urged the court to uphold a lower court ruling that had declared that the government imposed unconstitutional restrictions on the ability of the organizations to use their own non-federal funds.

At stake is the ability of legal service providers who receive some federal LSC funding to use their non-federal dollars to provide certain important services, such as representing clients in class action lawsuits, claiming court-ordered attorneys’ fee awards, or providing assistance to certain categories of legal immigrants. Under the challenged rule, programs would have to establish physically separate offices and hire new staff to do such work -- even if they pay for those cases with money from non-federal sources. This “physical separation requirement” imposes a severe burden on the plaintiff legal services programs, which struggle to find funding to meet the needs of their clients.

We will post more information on the oral argument as we receive it.

Posted by Jennifer Lowe, 03:01:58 PM




Latest Entries by Theme

All Themes

Faith-Based Initiative

Elections and Issue Advocacy

Church Electioneering

Nonprofit Accountability

Charitable Giving

Speech and Lobbying Rights

Grants Streamlining

Charities and Security

General

Nonprofit Voter Mobilization

Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog

Controversial Rule on Abortion Moving Forward

Treasury Again Disregards Concerns with the Anti-Terrorism Financing Guidelines

Civil Liberties Group Sues North Carolina Board of Elections Challenging Total Ban on Lobbyist Contributions

Court Rules Anti-prostitution Pledge Requirement Unconsitutional

New Edition of Tax Guide for Churches and Religious Organizations

Nonprofit in New Mexico Told to Register as PAC

Voter Machine Flaws Will Not Be Corrected By Election Day

New Form 990 Instructions Available

New Voter Rights Project Provides Access to Legal Documents

FEC Seeks New Judge Assignment

Archived Entries for Speech and Lobbying Rights

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

July, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

December, 2006

October, 2006

September, 2006

August, 2006

July, 2006

June, 2006

May, 2006

April, 2006

March, 2006

February, 2006

January, 2006

December, 2005

November, 2005

October, 2005

September, 2005

August, 2005

July, 2005

June, 2005

May, 2005

April, 2005

March, 2005

January, 2005

December, 2004

November, 2004