HOME
ABOUT US
OUR ISSUES
Federal Budget
Information & Access
Nonprofit Advocacy
Advocacy Blog
Charities and National Security
Elections and Issue Advocacy
Lobbying and Speech Rights
Nonprofit Voter Mobilization
Rights of Gov't Grantees
Research
General Nonprofit Issues
Archives
Regulatory Policy
PRESS ROOM
ACTION CENTER
PUBLICATIONS
THE WATCHER
OUR BLOGS
SIGN UP
Receive news, updates, and alerts!
DONATE
Help support our work
OTHER SITES
FedSpending.org
RTK NET
NPAction
Working Group on Community Right-to-Know
Citizens for Sensible Safeguards
Open the Government
Promoting and protecting nonprofit advocacy for a stronger democracy
Thursday, February 09, 2006
The incentives include an IRA charitable rollover proposal.
The President’s IRA rollover proposal would allow people over the age of 65 to donate money from qualifying individual retirement accounts to charity without penalty. This differs from the IRA rollover provision included in S. 2020 — a person must be age 70 ½ to take advantage of the Senate-passed provision.
As for charitable reform, the President’s budget calls for the imposition of penalties on charities that fail to enforce conservation easements. There are no other charitable reform provisions affecting foundations in the FY07 budget.
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
The American Bar Assoc. sent a letter to Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT).
According to United Way, the proposed nonitemizer deduction in the Senate tax reconciliation bill (formerly S. 2020, now incorporated in H.R. 4297) could increase charitable giving to United Way alone by a net $180 million a year.
In a news release, United Way said that while the proposed deduction can be expected to cause a $62 million drop in giving by itemizing taxpayers--who would face a $210 floor for the first time--the amount of those willing to give to United Way because of the new deduction is expected to rise to $242 million--for a positive effect overall.
Opponents of the provision fear that the provision would be a major shift by Congress away from the tax policy that grants taxpayers full credit for their support of charities. On Jan. 20, a group of more than 60 charitable organizations sent a letter to House and Senate tax committees urging them to drop the nonitemizer.
The groups, which include the Association of Direct Response Fundraising Counsel and the North Shore Animal League, pointed out that, under the Senate proposal, before an individual can take a charitable contribution deduction, they must exceed the floor and can only deduct the amount in excess of the floor. The organizations believe that they will end up losing donors. They argued that $420 is a considerable sum of money and the provision could cause itemizing donors to give less, since the tax incentive would be reduced.
Latest Entries by Theme
All Themes
Faith-Based Initiative
Church Electioneering
Nonprofit Accountability
Charitable Giving
Speech and Lobbying Rights
Grants Streamlining
Charities and Security
General
Most Recent Entries for Advocacy Blog
Charity Sues Government for Freezing Its Assets
Nonviolent Activists Placed on Terror Lists
New Fact Sheet for 501(c)(3) Groups On Proper Contact With Campaigns
Ex-Offender Voter Rights Confuse Alabama Officials
New 501(c)(4) Group Files A Familiar Lawsuit
New GAO Report on Lobbyist Compliance with Disclosure Reporting
U.S. Government Stops International Charity's Family Planning Work
Early Voting is Changing the Meaning of Election Day
EU Court Says Charity Listed as Terrorist Has Due Process Rights
Dozens of Pastors Violate Federal Tax Law by Endorsing Political Candidates from the Pulpit
Archived Entries for Charitable Giving
October
August
May
February
January
November, 2007
March, 2007
August, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
December, 2005
November, 2005
October, 2005
September, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
December, 2004
November, 2004