HOME
ABOUT US
OUR ISSUES
Federal Budget
Information & Access
Nonprofit Advocacy
Regulatory Policy
DudleyWatch
Unmet Needs
Paralysis by Analysis
White House Interventions
Special Interests v. Public Interest
National Solutions for National Needs
In Congress
In the Courts
Public Participation
The Bush Record
Reports & Analyses
RegWatch
Resource Center
PRESS ROOM
ACTION CENTER
PUBLICATIONS
THE WATCHER
OUR BLOGS
SIGN UP
Receive news, updates, and alerts!
DONATE
Help support our work
OTHER SITES
FedSpending.org
RTK NET
NPAction
Working Group on Community Right-to-Know
Citizens for Sensible Safeguards
Open the Government
"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR
News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room
Friday, January 19, 2007
The New York Times and Washington Post report today that Sen. Ted Kennedy will reintroduce legislation calling for regulation of the tobacco industry. Kennedy first introduced the bill in 2004 when it was passed by the Senate but stalled in the House.
The bill proposes to place tobacco industry — which for years has been largely unregulated — within the regulatory view of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA would be able to have a say in advertising, packaging, and content, according to the Washington Post. The rise in attention to this issue comes in response to a Harvard study concluding nicotine levels have been steadily rising in cigarettes.
This bill is a common sense approach to regulating a dangerous product; and should be considered reasonable by all parties, even tobacco farmers, who will be offered hefty compensation. It is a measure that lawmakers on both sides of the aisle should ardently support.
Wednesday, January 03, 2007
This week marks the 100th Anniversary of the implementation of the Pure Food and Drug Act, a landmark piece of legislation calling for federal inspection of food products and paving the way for the creation of the Food and Drug Administration. However, as a January 2 New York Times editorial points out, advances in food safety are far from adequate considering how much time has elapsed.
Though nearly a century had passed, 2006 may have been the nadir of the federal food safety era. A spinach contamination outbreak in the fall killed three, and mysterious Taco Bell food poisonings only aggravated national concern. The Times editorial points out that anti-government conservatism has been a contributing factor in the declining safety:
Since the Reagan era, conservatives have tried to turn "government regulation" into an epithet…Food safety has been particularly hard-hit by this anti-regulatory climate.
The Times is calling for the new Congress to "hold hearings to get to the bottom of those recent food disasters and to explore what the next ones are likely to be." Here's to hoping the 110th puts food safety on its legislative plate.
Latest Entries by Theme
All Themes
Enforcement
About This Blog
Rollbacks
Safety
Industry Influence
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Publications
Consumer Issues
Environment
Public Health
Oversight
In the White House
Most Recent Entries for RegWatch
Industry Ties Bind FDA Advisors
Right Whale Protection Rule Finally Here
Industry Pressuring EPA to Weaken Lead Rule
EPA Won't Keep Rocket Fuel out of Water
Roof Strength Rule Delayed Again
Bush Taking Credit for Whale Rule He Delayed
What Should the U.S. Do about China's Bad Milk?
Did OMB Block Asbestos Cleanup in Montana Town?
Whale Protection Rule Clears White House, 573 Days Later
EPA Just Kidding Around on Children's Health
Archived Entries for Oversight
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
September, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
April, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
October, 2005
September, 2005
July, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
December, 2004
November, 2004
October, 2004