HOME
ABOUT US
OUR ISSUES
Federal Budget
Information & Access
Nonprofit Advocacy
Regulatory Policy
DudleyWatch
Unmet Needs
Paralysis by Analysis
White House Interventions
Special Interests v. Public Interest
National Solutions for National Needs
In Congress
In the Courts
Public Participation
The Bush Record
Reports & Analyses
RegWatch
Resource Center
PRESS ROOM
ACTION CENTER
PUBLICATIONS
THE WATCHER
OUR BLOGS
SIGN UP
Receive news, updates, and alerts!
DONATE
Help support our work
OTHER SITES
FedSpending.org
RTK NET
NPAction
Working Group on Community Right-to-Know
Citizens for Sensible Safeguards
Open the Government
"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR
News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room
Friday, February 03, 2006
Regulators and auto makers began paying attention to S.U.V. collisions with cars in response to a 1997 series in The New York Times. Before then, regulators had done more than 2000 tests without ever crashing an S.U.V. into a car, while automakers said that they did not look at compatibility in crashes when designing vehicles. Sales of S.U.V.'s and pickups were booming, but automakers soon faced pressure from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which threatened to impose mandatory regulations if the industry did not act. In a landmark agreement in 2003, 15 automakers from four nations agreed that by late 2009, all S.U.V.'s and pickups would either be lower to the ground or built with an energy-absorbing beam that fits under the front and rear bumpers.
Sales of S.U.V.'s and pickups were booming, but automakers soon faced pressure from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which threatened to impose mandatory regulations if the industry did not act.
In a landmark agreement in 2003, 15 automakers from four nations agreed that by late 2009, all S.U.V.'s and pickups would either be lower to the ground or built with an energy-absorbing beam that fits under the front and rear bumpers.
Of course, the success is only partial. Tens of millions of older models are still on the road. NHTSA's failure to act sooner means car passengers will continue to face increased risk until these older models are phased out over time.
Latest Entries by Theme
All Themes
Enforcement
About This Blog
Rollbacks
Safety
Industry Influence
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Publications
Consumer Issues
Environment
Public Health
Oversight
In the White House
Most Recent Entries for RegWatch
Occupational Risk Rule Clears White House
With Concessions to Industry, Right Whale Rule May Be Moving
In Rare Move, White House Rubber Stamped Abortion Proposal
Controversial Rule on Abortion Moving Forward
Bush Administration Backs Off SCHIP Restrictions
Bush Signs Consumer Product Safety Bill
Bush Administration Cuts Habitat for Spotted Owl
Bush Trying Last-Minute Changes to Endangered Species Act
For EPA Staff Trying to Protect the Planet, "Disappointment is Profound"
Consumer Product Bill Delivers Win for Consumers
Archived Entries for Consumer Issues
August
July
May
April
March
February
January
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
December, 2006
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
December, 2005
November, 2005
October, 2005
September, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
December, 2004
November, 2004
October, 2004
September, 2004