Regulatory Policy - RegWatch - OMB Watch

Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Credo Mobile

OUR ISSUES

Information & Access

Nonprofit Advocacy

Regulatory Policy

Paralysis by Analysis

White House Interventions

Special Interests v. Public Interest

National Solutions for National Needs

Public Participation

The Bush Record

Reports & Analyses

Resource Center

Receive news, updates, and alerts!

Help support our work

OTHER SITES

FedSpending.org

Working Group on Community Right-to-Know

Citizens for Sensible Safeguards

Open the Government

"[P]eople acting in a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could even hope to bring about." - FDR

Donate Now and Help Safeguard our Protections

Home : Regulatory Policy : RegWatch :

RegWatch:

News & Analysis | REG•WATCH Blog | Press Room

R E G • W A T C H

Friday, August 12, 2005

Regulation and Competitiveness
The industry-funded position in favor of rollbacks often includes an argument that regulation to protect the public is a burden on American businesses that hinder them from competing in the global marketplace. The evidence from the economics literature tells us something much, much different. Learn more in this OMB Watch issue brief, Regulation and Competitiveness.

Posted by Robert Shull, 12:16:20 PM

Latest Entries by Theme

About This Blog

Industry Influence

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Consumer Issues

In the White House

Most Recent Entries for RegWatch

Industry Ties Bind FDA Advisors

Right Whale Protection Rule Finally Here

Industry Pressuring EPA to Weaken Lead Rule

EPA Won't Keep Rocket Fuel out of Water

Roof Strength Rule Delayed Again

Bush Taking Credit for Whale Rule He Delayed

What Should the U.S. Do about China's Bad Milk?

Did OMB Block Asbestos Cleanup in Montana Town?

Whale Protection Rule Clears White House, 573 Days Later

EPA Just Kidding Around on Children's Health

Archived Entries for Cost-Benefit Analysis

September, 2007

September, 2006

September, 2005

September, 2004